Abercrombie and Fitch pays its CEO 1,640 times more than the average worker.
At Simon Property Group, it is 1,594 times more.
These numbers are based on a<="http://go.bloomberg.com/multimedia/ceo-pay-ratio/"> Bloomberg News calculation that concludes CEOs on average take home 204 times more than their rank-and-file employees.
Three years ago, a provision in the Dodd-Frank financial reform law says the companies themselves have to reveal the difference between worker pay and CEO pay. That reform still hasn't been implemented. And now the CEOs' lobbyists are pressuring Republicans in the U.S. House of Representatives to repeal it.
On Wednesday, the House Financial Services Committee will consider legislation, <="http://beta.congress.gov/bill/113th-congress/house-bill/1135">HR 1135, that strips the wage-gap disclosure requirement from Dodd-Frank.
The CEOs are understandably embarrassed about the size of their plunder, especially when compared to the pittance they pay their workers. That's not their argument, though. They insist that calculating the CEO-to-worker pay ratio is too hard for them to do.
It is simply not credible for companies to say they don't know how to collect data or that it is too burdensome.
The Teamsters know from 100-plus years of collective bargaining that companies quantify a dollar cost for just about every aspect of work possible.
And as pension fund investors, we need the information required by Dodd-Frank to evaluate an investment. If a CEO is allowed to loot a company, the morale and productivity for its rank-and-file employees will suffer.
The Teamsters are one of more than 250 groups that make up <="http://ourfinancialsecurity.org/">Americans for Financial Reform (AFR), a coalition of labor, consumer, civil rights, investor, retiree, community, religious and business groups that came together to reform the financial industry. In a <="http://ourfinancialsecurity.org/blogs/wp-content/ourfinancialsecurity.org/uploads/2013/05/AFR-Oppose-HR-1135-5-22-13.pdf">letter sent to lawmakers last month, AFR noted the passage of HR 1135 will shield CEOs from the shame that would come from the public learning about their outrageous compensation while axing an important provision of the law:
Disclosure of CEO-to-employee pay ratios will encourage Boards of Directors to limit CEO pay levels. Part of the CEO pay problem is that the existing disclosure rules encourage companies to focus on what other companies pay their CEOs. Because CEOs believe that they should be paid above average, this "groupthink" compensation process leads to ever-spiraling pay increases for CEOs.
0 comments:
Post a Comment